Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
spacer
Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
spacer
ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
spacer
The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
spacer
The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
spacer
Three things to consider when switching your super
spacer
Oldest Buildings in the World.
spacer
Illegal access nets $637 million
spacer
Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
spacer
Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
spacer
Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
spacer
Planning financially for a career break
spacer
Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
spacer
Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
spacer
Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
spacer
Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
spacer
Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
spacer
Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
spacer
Super literacy low for cash-strapped
spacer
Four timeless principles for investing success
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
spacer
Wheat Production by Country
spacer
Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
spacer
Millions of Australians lose by leaving savings in default MySuper funds
spacer
Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2024: A return to sound money
spacer
An investment year of ups and downs
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
99 pct of SMSFs missing global opportunities

On most days there are more dollars traded in Apple stock in the United States than on the entire Australian stock market. 

       

 

It’s no wonder then that over 85 per cent of overseas shares bought by Australians are US purchases. A figure this high would indicate a keen appetite for overseas investing. But when it comes to SMSFs, in my opinion, the numbers are worryingly low.

Just 0.6 per cent of self-managed super assets are invested in overseas shares, compared to 26.7 percent of industry super funds. As a global trader, these statistics are concerning. Limiting investment to Australian shores alone means SMSFs are simply limiting their opportunities for returns and leaving themselves vulnerable and exposed for the future.

What's even more staggering is trustees continue to allocate too little overseas when the costs of investing globally are significantly lower than trading locally. At the same time, the potential opportunities overseas dwarf those at home. When you have control of your investments, wouldn’t you want to lower your costs and give yourself the best chance of success? It’s just better business. 

Australian SMSFs vulnerable

Such low uptake in overseas investment opportunities wouldn’t be such a concern if SMSFs were thriving. Yet ATO SMSF statistics for 2017 showed almost half of them did not make any money. In fact, the 10 per cent of SMSFs with balances of less than $100,000 have lost money year-on-year since 2008.

SMSFs are failing to make gains and there’s little investment in overseas shares – it’s hard to see why the link between the two isn’t being made. Australians need to be investing where the rest of the world is. Failure to do so and keeping their investments on home turf will trap them in a cycle of loss.

Diversity redefined: looking beyond borders

Diversity is a much-used buzzword drilled into all client conversations (as well as being something you discuss with friends and family for that matter). Diversity is the key to minimise year-on-year investment loss. But as access to the global stock market rapidly becomes easier, the meaning of diversity is being redefined.

Diversity means investing beyond borders; exploring the emerging markets and beyond ‘traditional’ industries on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), such as healthcare, banking and mining. In a world where innovation is running the news agenda and the start-up industry has been given a new lease of life through rapid advancements in technology, diversity is taking on a whole new meaning.

Access to diverse opportunities

Let’s look at the most glaringly obvious reasons to invest in the US: emerging industries such as technology, robotics and semiconductors. Right now it is almost impossible to trade any of these industries on the ASX; there are just no major company listing in these areas. 

Similarly, being able to access exchange-traded funds (ETF) that cover asset classes unavailable in Australia means investors can generate returns in any market conditions. Accessing ETFs over bonds, soft commodities, oil and volatility, and the ability to get simple inverse exposure to the market in the US mean those SMSFs that make the jump early to the US markets are light years ahead of their peers. The rest stay entrenched in our local market. 

Previously, barriers to overseas markets, including high trading fees, significant paperwork and complex platforms, meant local investors couldn’t access these opportunities simply and affordably.

This loophole is being closed with fintech start-ups disrupting the market and opening up access to overseas stock markets. We’re seeing this at Stake.com.au with over $30 million transacted on-site. This is just the start.

Reduce vulnerability

The 99.04 per cent of Australians with SMSFs who are not investing in the world beyond Australia are limiting their potential for returns and leaving themselves vulnerable to an uncertain future. To be truly diverse, SMSFs should follow the growing trend of Australian investors using new tools to take their investment out of their backyard and onto the global market.

 

By Matthew Leibowitz (co-founder of Stake)
​11 Apr 2018
www.smsmagazine.com.au

Site by Plannerweb