Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
spacer
Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
spacer
ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
spacer
The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
spacer
The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
spacer
Three things to consider when switching your super
spacer
Oldest Buildings in the World.
spacer
Illegal access nets $637 million
spacer
Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
spacer
Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
spacer
Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
spacer
Planning financially for a career break
spacer
Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
spacer
Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
spacer
Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
spacer
Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
spacer
Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
spacer
Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
spacer
Super literacy low for cash-strapped
spacer
Four timeless principles for investing success
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
spacer
Wheat Production by Country
spacer
Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes

The majority of Australians are opposed to further changes to the retirement system, despite the rising costs with supporting an ageing population a recent survey has shown.

           

 

A survey commissioned by Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand asked more than 1,200 Australian and New Zealand residents on their thoughts about how to create a more sustainable retirement system.

CA ANZ superannuation leader Tony Negline said the results show that the Australian public’s dominant preference is for the status quo to remain in place and that the government pension should be provided with current means testing rules in Australia.

The report indicated considerable disagreement about the preferred policy options for dealing with the increased costs of an ageing population.

The most heavily opposed policy option was across the board reductions to the amount in the amount paid.

The survey revealed that while only 41 per cent of couples and 35 per cent of singles in Australia feel they ‘get by’ on current age pension income levels, only 12 per cent of couples and 12 per cent of singles feel they could live comfortably at that level.

“There was mixed support for the other options, including increasing the age of entitlement, amending how adjustments occur or pre-funding through increased current taxes,” the report said.

The least unpopular option with New Zealanders and Australians across all age groups was the use of income and asset testing, the report said, however even this option was not met with much enthusiasm.

“Interestingly support for asset testing did not extend to including the family home, which was rejected by all grouping differentials — age, gender, income, location, employment status and so on,” the report said.

“Support came through for egalitarian notions of paying through taxation and restricting access to those.”

Mr Negline said politicians are between a “rock and a hard place”.

“The public don’t want change, despite knowing the system will cost significantly more in the future,” he said.

“People clearly want to see the status quo remain and the government pension provided universally without continued means testing in Australia.”

 

 

By Staff Reporter
11 May 2018
www.smsfadviser.com

Site by Plannerweb